According to statistics on Friday, May 13, the top stablecoins by market capitalization are currently worth $163.7 billion after the stablecoin economy was valued at close to $200 billion just last week. Of course, the climactic terrausd (UST) failure wiped out billions from the stablecoin economy, and Binance’s stablecoin BUSD has recently entered the top ten crypto market capitalization positions. Just as it caused carnage in the crypto economy, Terra’s recent downfall has caused a great shift within the stablecoin ecosystem.
The Stablecoin Economy’s Great Shift
It was only a week ago when the stablecoin economy was awfully close to surpassing the $200 billion mark, but Terra’s recent collapse changed all that. Terra’s once stable token terrausd (UST) was once the third-largest stablecoin in existence until it lost its $1 parity. The token that’s supposed to be pegged to a U.S. dollar’s value is now trading for under $0.20 per unit. Still, the market valuation makes it the sixth-largest market cap in coingecko.com’s “Stablecoins by Market Capitalization” list.
During the last month, out of the top ten stablecoins by market valuation, none of the stablecoin projects saw growth. USDC dipped by 0% over the last 30 days, while all the other top stablecoins saw 30-day declines. BUSD is now the third-largest stablecoin token today with a $17.3 billion market capitalization and BUSD has also stepped into the top ten crypto coins by market cap, taking the ninth position among 13,000+ coins.
Makerdao’s DAI token is now the fourth-largest stablecoin market capitalization with $6 billion today. Makerdao’s native token MKR jumped 15% in value during the past 24 hours taking on some of UST’s fallout. In fact, most of the stablecoins that have managed to remain stable and have reaped the benefits of UST’s crash.
While Some See the Need for ‘More Regulatory Framework’ Around Fiat-Pegged Coins, Some Believe a Decentralized Stablecoin Is Still Needed
On May 12, 2022, Circle Financial’s CEO Jeremy Allaire tweeted: “USDC/USDT is the trade of the day. Flight to quality.” The Circle executive appeared on CNBC’s broadcast “Squawk Box,” and noted that there needs to be “more regulatory framework around stablecoins.” A number of people have been watching the performance of so-called decentralized and algorithmic stablecoins extremely closely since Terra’s downfall.
Despite the recent Terra UST carnage, many still believe there’s a great need for decentralized and algorithmic stablecoins among the centralized giants. Avalanche (AVAX) founder Emin Gün Sirer believes the crypto ecosystem needs a decentralized stablecoin.
A day before LUNA went under a U.S. penny, Gün Sirer said: “Even fully-collateralized fiat stablecoins have de-pegged. Even some of the weak [algorithmic] stablecoins have recovered.” The AVAX founder also stated that he had “always said that [algorithmic] stables are subject to destabilizing bank runs.” Despite the bank run risk, Gün Sirer explained that a decentralized stablecoin is still needed in the industry.
“We need a decentralized stablecoin,” Gün Sirer detailed. “Fiat-backed stables are subject to legal seizure and capture. A decentralized economy needs a decentralized stablecoin whose backing store cannot be frozen or confiscated.”
What do you think about the stablecoin economy shuffle this week? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.
Jamie Redman
Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.